When Volume Masquerades as Credibility

We were warned, weren’t we? “Don’t believe everything you see on the internet.” A cute line from the early 2000’s, back when the internet felt like a novelty, not the bloodstream of society.

But today the warning hits differently. Not because we’re gullible. But because we’re drowning.

Billions of people now carry a device capable of delivering more information in a single day than a human in the 1800s would encounter in their entire lifetime. It’s a firehose, relentless, unfiltered, algorithmically shaped, and delivered with the polished confidence of something that looks authoritative simply because of its scale.

The modern dilemma isn’t that information is hard to find. It’s that impossible to trust.

And in a world where volume masquerades as credibility, that might be the most dangerous shift of all.

AI complicates this further. A video may look real. A report may look authoritative. A headline may appear credible because an algorithm predicted you’d like it. And the sheer volume and delivery of information gives it an unearned legitimacy. “If everyone is saying it, it must be true,” right?

I saw a version of this problem early in my career while working at a large software firm. Leadership had just introduced a new knowledge base system, completely empty at launch. To accelerate adoption, every employee was required to submit three articles each month. Bonuses depended on meeting those numbers.

Quality collapsed almost immediately.

The QA team couldn’t keep up, stuck between quality control and their managers’ bonuses. Standards slipped. Bad data crowded out good data. Search results became bloated with irrelevant or misleading articles. The system looked rich with knowledge, thousands of entries, growing every month, but the more populated it became, the less anyone trusted it. Leadership was still grappling with the fallout after I left.

This is the danger of data in volume:

Quantity creates the illusion of credibility.

Credibility creates misplaced trust. Misplaced trust creates bad decisions.

We see the same thing now on a global scale. A single Google search can return millions of results. Data centers are being built at unprecedented speed just to store and process this flood. And while AI is producing extraordinary breakthroughs, it is also accelerating the speed at which unverified information enters the ecosystem.

We haven’t just lost sight of the quality of information, we’ve lost sight of the trust threshold altogether. We assume that volume equals accuracy. That repetition equals truth. That a full database must be a reliable database.

But the truth is simple:

We are standing at a crossroads: the most informed era in human history, and the least certain about what any of it means. Information has become abundant, cheap, and frictionless. Trust, by contrast, has become rare, expensive, and easily manipulated.

And here’s the uncomfortable truth:

The more data we produce without accountability, the less any of it deserves to be trusted.

The solution is not more content. It’s not faster AI models. It’s not bigger data centers, wider pipes, or smarter algorithms.

The solution is discipline.

Discipline in what we create.

Discipline in what we share. Discipline in what we accept as truth.

Because if we don’t set a higher bar for data integrity, we will mistake volume for wisdom and noise for knowledge. And when a society can no longer trust the information it consumes, the consequences reach far beyond technology; they shape how we think, how we decide, and ultimately, who we become.

In the end, the future won’t be defined by how much data we can produce. It will be defined by how much of it we can trust.

If this essay was useful, share it with someone who’s carrying a similar problem.

Link copied.